課程資訊
課程名稱
英文漢學中的問題與爭論二
Controversies and Debates in Anglophonic Sinology (Ⅱ) 
開課學期
100-2 
授課對象
文學院  歷史學研究所  
授課教師
宋家復 
課號
Hist5019 
課程識別碼
123 U8420 
班次
 
學分
全/半年
半年 
必/選修
選修 
上課時間
星期四3,4(10:20~12:10) 
上課地點
博雅402 
備註
修習對象:大三以上、碩士生。
限學士班三年級以上
總人數上限:20人 
Ceiba 課程網頁
http://ceiba.ntu.edu.tw/1002CDAC 
課程簡介影片
 
核心能力關聯
核心能力與課程規劃關聯圖
課程大綱
為確保您我的權利,請尊重智慧財產權及不得非法影印
課程概述

123 U8420中國研究的海內外分進合流近年來已經蔚為風潮,在研究課題和取徑上中外學者分享共通的機會愈見頻繁。本課程的目的,在於藉著閱讀過去半世紀以來英文中國研究學界內(外)所生產的一系列論辯文獻,接引大學部高年級主修歷史(或人文社會科學)的同學平順進入問題取向的跨國語境。這不是一門二次大戰後西方漢學研究的通史或文獻回顧,因為著重的只限於曾經引發學者之間公開爭議辯論的課題。  

課程目標
希望在精讀前輩學者們彼此針鋒相對、砥礪琢磨的論述之中,我們學會欣賞學界的多元喧嘩與有情眾生的有限性,並且幫助我們自身研究問題意識的形塑與反思。 
課程要求
基本的學術英文閱讀能力,審問深思暨自我問題化的意願。  
預期每週課後學習時數
 
Office Hours
另約時間 
指定閱讀
1文化中國的定義問題
Tu Wei-ming, “Cultural China: The Periphery as Center,” Daedalus: Journal of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 120: 2 (1991).

2文化中國的定義問題
Paul A. Cohen, “Cultural China: Some definitional Issues,” PEW 43:3 (1993), pp. 557-63.

3中國中心史觀:外國學者的分寸
Michael Gasster, “Discovering China in History: Some Comments on Paul Cohen’s Discovering History in China,” The American Asian Review 5: 2 (1987), pp. 121-53.

4中國中心史觀:外國學者的分寸
Paul A. Cohen, “Our Proper Concerns as Historians of China: A Reply to Michael Gasster,” The American Asian Review 6:1 (1988), pp. 1-24.

5徘徊在文本與脈絡之間的思想傳記
Ying-shih Yü, “The Intellectual World of Chiao Hung Revisited: A Review Article,” Ming Studies 25 (1988), pp. 24-66.

6徘徊在文本與脈絡之間的思想傳記
Edward T. Ch’ien, “Neither Structuralism Nor Lovejoy’s History of Ideas: A Disidentificaion with Professor Yü Ying-shih’s Review as a Dis-course,” Ming Studies 31 (1991), pp. 42-86.

7懷柔遠人:望文生義抑或就事論事
Joseph W. Esherick, “Cherishing Sources from afar,” Modern China 24:2 (1998), pp. 135-61.

8懷柔遠人:望文生義抑或就事論事
James Hevia, “Postpolemical Historiography: A Reply to James Hevia,” Modern China 24:3 (1998), pp. 319-27. Esherick’s reply, pp. 328-32.

9儒學第三期 – 追求或臆想?
Tu Wei-ming, “Iconoclasm, Holistic Vision, and Patient Watchfulness: A Personal Reflection on the Modern Chinese Intellectual Quest,” Daedalus 116:2 (1987), pp. 75-94.

10儒學第三期 – 追求或臆想?
Arif Dirlik, “Confucius in Borderlands: Global Capitalism and the Reinvention of Confucianism,” Boundary 2 (1995), pp. 229-73.

11“孔夫子主義Confucianism”根本是傳教士建構的產物?
Lionel M. Jensen, Manufacturing Confucianism: Chinese Traditions and Universal Civilization, Duke UP, 1997.

12“孔夫子主義Confucianism”根本是傳教士建構的產物?
Willard J. Peterson, review, HJAS 59:1 (1999), pp. 276-83.
T. H. Barrett, “Is There a Chinese Word for “Confucius”? A Review Article,” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 62:1 (1999), pp. 105-10.

13中國如何如何,誰說了算?
Robert Bagley, review of Monumentality in Early Chinese Art and Architecture by Wu Hung, HJAS 58:1 (1998), pp. 221-56.

14中國如何如何,誰說了算?
Wu Hung, “A Response to Robert Bagley’s Review of My Book,” Archives of Asian Art 51 (1998/99), pp. 92-102.

15清朝:漢化靠攏?多元典範?
Ping-Ti Ho, “In Defense of Sinicization: a Rebuttal of Evelyn Rawski's "Reenvisioning the Qing," JAS 57:1 (Feb 1998), pp. 123-155.

16清朝:漢化靠攏?多元典範?
Evelyn S. Rawski, “Presidential Address: Reenvisioning the Qing: the Significance of the Qing Period in Chinese History,” JAS 55:4 (Nov 1996), pp. 829-850.

17公共領域在中國是否可能?
William T. Rowe, “The Public Sphere in Modern China,” Modern China 16:3 (Jul 1990), pp. 309-329.

18公共領域在中國是否可能?
Philip C.C. Huang, “'Public sphere' / 'civil society' in China? The third realm between state and society,” Modern China 19:2 (Apr 1993), pp. 216-240.
 
參考書目
 
評量方式
(僅供參考)
   
課程進度
週次
日期
單元主題